NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Labracon Pty Limited v Cuturich & Anor [2013] NSWSC 97 Hearing dates: 10, 11, 12 October 2012 Decision date: 26 February 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Lindsay J Decision: Judgment for the Plaintiff. Direct that parties bring in short minutes of orders giving effect to these Reasons Catchwords: CONTRACTS - general contractual principles - illegal and void contracts - plaintiff was assignee of two loan agreements between assignor as lender and first defendant as borrower, charging land owned by first defendant - plaintiff was the assignee of a deed of charge between assignor as lender, first defendant as borrower, and second defendant as chargee - whether loan agreements and deed of charge were unenforceable as elements of a sham arrangement intending to defraud creditors of the defendants. ESTOPPEL - estoppel by deed - in general - plaintiff was the assignee of two loan agreements and a deed of charge acknowledging the receipt of loan moneys by the first defendant from the assignor - whether the defendants were bound by any estoppel from denying receipt of the moneys. ESTOPPEL - estoppel by deed - in general - whether estoppel by deed is a subset of estoppel by convention. DEEDS - what amounts to a deed - generally - defendants' execution of two instruments was not attested by a non-party witness - section 38(1) of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) does not require each and every signature to have been attested by a non-party witness - a party who knowingly takes the benefit of a deed may be bound by it even without execution of it. DEEDS - other matters - enforceability of receipt clause - plaintiff took assignment of lender's rights under the deeds without notice of any deficiency in amounts paid to borrower compared with amounts acknowledged as having been received - whether plaintiff was entitled to a judgment in debt in the sum of the amounts acknowledged as having been received Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 NSW, ss 39-40, s 36C, Part 3(ss 38-51A) ss 116-118 Real Property Act 1900 NSW, s 36(11) Cases Cited: Effem Foods Pty Limited v Trawl Industries of Australia Pty Limited (1993) 43 FCR 510 (1992) 36 FCR 406) Ramsay v Pigram (1968) 118 CLR 271. Read Johnson; ex-parte Greendale Engineering & Cables Pty Limited (1967) 11 FLR 335 Aikman v Brown (1973) 1 ACTR 121. Cf, Pethybridge v Stedikas Holdings Pty Limited [2007] NSWCA 154 Greer v Kettle [1938] AC 156 at 170-172; Cousens v Grayridge Pty Limited [2000] VSCA 96 at [58] Reliance Finance Corporation Pty Ltd v Heid [1982] 1 NSWLR 466 at 483C-484B Heid v Reliance Finance Corporation Pty Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 326 Ellison v Vukicevic (1986) 7 NSWLR 104 at 112D-G,107G-108D Vukicevic v Alliance Acceptance Co Limited (1987) 9 NSWLR 13. Lady Nass v Westminster Bank Limited [1940] AC 366 at 373 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Taylor (1929) 42 CLR 80 at 85 and 87 Hooker Industrial Developments Pty Limited v Trustees of the Christian Brothers [1977] 2 NSWLR 109 at 116F, 118D-119B and 119E-F 400 George Street (Qld) Pty Ltd v BG International Ltd [2010] 2 Qd R 302 Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406 at 430 Thompson v Palmer (1933) 49 CLR 507 at 547 Newbon v City Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd (1935) 52 CLR 723 at 734-735 Grundt v Great Boulder Pty Gold Mines Ltd (1937) 59 CLR 641 at 674-677) Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427 at 455-456 [101] note 92 Partridge v McIntosh and Sons Ltd (1933) 49 CLR 453 at 462-463, 465 and 466-467 Mirzikinian v Waterhouse Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 296 Segboer v AJ Richardson Properties Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 253 Texts Cited: Halsbury's Laws of Australia, (Lexis Nexis, Australia), Title No 140 "Deeds and Other Instruments Norton on Deeds; Needham, "Deeds - Formalities" (1985) 1 Aust Bar Rev 3 Norton on Deeds (2nd ed, 1928), pp 226-228, and p 213 (para 4) Annotated Conveyancing and Real Property Legislation, NSW (Lexis Nexis, Australia, 2012) JS Ewart (An Exposition of the Principles of Estoppel by Misrepresentation (Stevens & Sons, London, 1900), p 1) Handley (Estoppel by conduct and election (2006), para [1-007] note 24 on p 4 Odgers' Construction of Deeds and Statutes (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 5th ed, 1967), Part I; pp 165-167 Coke on Littleton, para [3526] second rule Category: Principal judgment Parties: Labracon Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Melissa Cuturich (First Defendant) Classique Property Group Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: McLachlan Thorpe File Number(s): 2011/330149
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate