NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Strathfield Council v Australian Catholic University Limited [2013] NSWLEC 22 Hearing dates: 19, 21 February 2013 Decision date: 22 February 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pain J Decision: 1. Prayer 3 of the Council's Notice of Motion filed 19 February 2013 is refused. 2. Leave is not granted to disclose the Points of Defence filed on 5 February 2013 to the Planning Assessment Committee. 3. On 1 March 2013 an order will be made that Strathfield Council must pay Australian Catholic University Limited's costs unless the Council files written submissions by 5pm 28 February 2013. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - implied undertaking that documents compulsorily disclosed in proceedings, and not received into evidence, cannot without leave of the Court be used for any other purpose - whether court should lift implied undertaking on party not to disclose court documents - council wishing to disclose defence filed in court proceedings in Part 3A planning process before Planning Assessment Commission - no special circumstances demonstrated Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 16(1), s 86 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 16(1A) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 21.7 Cases Cited: Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; (2008) 235 CLR 125 Jali Local Aboriginal Land Council v Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act [2011] NSWLEC 67 James G Oberg (Sales) Pty Ltd v Oberg [2012] FCA 722; (2012) 292 ALR 673 Liberty Funding Pty Ltd v Phoenix Capital Ltd [2005] FCAFC 3; (2005) 218 ALR 283 Loti Tuquiri v Australian Rugby Union Limited [2009] NSWSC 781 Newcastle Muslim Association Incorporated v Newcastle City Council [2012] NSWLEC 20; 188 LGERA 159 QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Westpoint Realty Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1298 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Strathfield Council (Applicant) Australian Catholic University Limited (Respondent) Representation: Mr D Baird (solicitor) (Applicant) Mr C Withers (Respondent) HWL Ebsworth (Applicant) Clayton Utz (Respondent) File Number(s): 40619 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate