NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dymocks v Capral [2013] NSWSC 130 Hearing dates: 20/02/2013 Decision date: 20 February 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Technology and Construction List Before: McDougall J Decision: Tender rejected Catchwords: EVIDENCE - admissibility - where letter written by party's solicitor to insurer - party not the author of the letter and made no representations by or in it - letter not admissible to prove the truth of the the previous representations made by its author - letter not admissible to prove suggested admission by party. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Dymocks Book Arcade Pty Ltd (ABN 13 000 009 441) (Plaintiff) Capral Limited (ABN 78 004 213 692) (First Defendant) Peter Dalton Architects Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Stramit Corporation Limited (Formerly KH Stramit Corporation Limited) (First Cross-Defendant to Second Cross-Claim) Representation: Counsel: D T Miller SC / D A Hughes (Plaintiff) HJA Neal (First Defendant) IDM Roberts SC / LWF Chan (Second Defendant) I R Pike SC / J J Hutton (First Cross- Defendant to Second Cross-Claim) Solicitors: Norton Rose (Plaintiff) Colin Biggers & Paisley (First Defendant) Kennedys (Second Defendant) Sparke Helmore (First Defendant Second Cross-Claim) File Number(s): 2009/298893
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate