NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Navazi v New South Wales Land & Housing Corporation [2013] NSWSC 138 Hearing dates: 27/11/2012, 11/12/2012 Decision date: 01 March 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: Plaintiff to file short minutes to give effect to the quashing of the decision challenged. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Housing Act - decision to cancel housing rebate - requirements of investigation under s 58 - conduct of s 58 investigation a jurisdictional fact in decision to cancel rebate - requirement to consider and investigate weekly income - jurisdictional precondition not satisfied - orders granted Legislation Cited: Housing Act 2001 Cases Cited: Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission [2000] HCA 5; (2000) 199 CLR 135 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Myer Emporium Ltd [1987] HCA 18; (1987) 163 CLR 199 Gedeon v Commissioner of the NSW Crime Commission [2008] HCA 43; (2008) 236 CLR 120 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte [1938] HCA 7; (1938) 59 CLR 369 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Ronpibon Tin NL & Tongkah Compound NL v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1949] HCA 15; (1949) 78 CLR 47 Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL & Ors [1999] NSWCA 8; (1999) 46 NSWLR 55 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ali Navazi (also known as Nowronzali Navazihakani) (Plaintiff) New South Wales Land & Housing Corporation (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Johnson SC/P Bambagiotti (Plaintiff) J Smith/V McWilliam (Defendant) Solicitors: Salvos Legal Humanitarian (Plaintiff) Housing NSW (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/00201252
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate