NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ward v R [2013] NSWCCA 46 Hearing dates: 14 December 2012 Decision date: 01 March 2013 Before: McClellan JA at [1] Latham J at [246] Adamson J at [247] Decision: 1. Refuse leave to appeal the conviction except for Ground 6. 2. Grant leave to raise Ground 6 of the appeal but dismiss that ground. 3. Grant leave to appeal against sentence and dismiss that appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for leave to appeal against conviction - murder - direction on standard of proof - direction regarding rejected plea to manslaughter - direction on intoxication and intent - direction on provocation - direction on substantial impairment CRIMINAL LAW - application for leave to appeal against sentence - whether offence was mid range - effect of intoxication and culpability on sentence - approach to standard non-parole period after Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 224 CLR 120 - applicability of special circumstances. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Rules Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Aslett v R [2012] NSWCCA 235 Beldon v R [2012] NSWCCA 194 Collier v R [2012] NSWCCA 213 Darwiche & Ors v R [2011] NSWCCA 62 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; 79 NSWLR 1 Edwards v R [2009] NSWCCA 199 FP v R [2012] NSWCCA 182 Green v R (1971) 126 CLR 28 Green v The Queen (1996-97) 191 CLR 334 House v The King (1936) HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Libke v The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Ng v R [2011] NSWCCA 227 Papakosmos v R [1999] HCA 37; (1999) 196 CLR 297 R Margach [2007] VSCA 110 R v Bellchambers [2008] NSWCCA 235 R v Camplin [1978] AC 705 R v Chai [2002] NSWCCA 512 R v Cheatham [2002] NSWCCA 360 R v Croft [1981] 1 NSWLR 126 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Garlick [1981] 72 Cr App R 291 R v Gieselmann (Unreported, NSWCCA, 12 November 1996) R v GWM [2012] NSWCCA 240 R v Hazeltine [1967] 2 QB 857; 51 Crim App R 351 R v ITA [2003] NSWCCA 174; (2003) 139 A Crim R 340 R v Makisi [2004] NSWCCA 333 R v McGregor-Reid [1999] Crim LR 860 R v McKeown [2006] VSCA 74 R v Page [2008] VSCA 54 R v Picken [2007] NSWCCA 319 R v Ryan (1995) 90 A Crim R 191 R v Tripodina (1998) 35 A Crim R 183 at 195 R v Viro (1978) 141 CLR 88 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Yeardley [2000] 2 Crim App R 14 RWB v R [2010] NSWCCA 147 Shaw v The Queen (1952) 85 CLR 365 Teckley v R; Nagle v R [2007] NSWCCA 75 TKWJ v The Queen [2002] HCA 46; (2002) 212 CLR 124 Van den Hoek v The Queen (1986) 1 61 CLR 158 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sarah May Ward (Applicant) Crown Representation: Counsel: M Ramage QC (Applicant) M Cinque (Crown) Solicitors: Jeffreys Lawyers (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/11037 Decision under appeal Citation: [2010] NSWSC 304 Date of Decision: 2010-04-22 00:00:00 Before: Howie J File Number(s): 2009/11037
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate