NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Coffs Harbour City Council v The Minister for Planning and Infrastructure [2013] NSWCA 44 Hearing dates: 14 February 2013 Decision date: 06 March 2013 Before: Ward JA at [1]; Tobias AJA at [2]; Preston CJ of LEC at [3]. Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. The appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW - approval of concept plan for project - compliance of environmental assessment with administrative time requirement - whether time requirement a statutory requirement - whether environmental assessment submitted complied with time requirement - whether power to accept any non-compliance - whether any non-compliance results in invalidity of approval - inconsistency in terms of approval - whether so uncertain and unintelligible to be outside power - approval misdescribed proponent of project - whether statutory requirement that approval identify correctly a legal entity as proponent - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Cases Cited: Brown v West (1998) 169 CLR 195 Johns v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 178 CLR 408 Macquarie Generation v Hodgson [2011] NSWCA 424; (2011) 186 LGERA 311 Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd (1996) 91 LGERA 31 Nguyen v Minister for Health and Ageing [2002] FCA 1241 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Ulan Coal Mines Ltd v Minister for Planning [2008] NSWLEC 185; (2008) 160 LGERA 20 Westfield Management Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd [2006] NSWCA 245 Whittaker v Comcare (1998) 86 FCR 532 Woolworths Ltd v Campbells Cash & Carry Pty Ltd (1996) 92 LGERA 244 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Coffs Harbour City Council (Appellant) The Minister for Planning and Infrastructure (First Respondent) Sandy Shores Development Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) The Director-General of the NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure (Third Respondent) Representation: Mr R P L Lancaster SC (Appellant) Ms K Stern SC with Ms H P Irish (First and Third Respondents) Mr N M Eastman (Barrister) (Second Respondent) Sparke Helmore (Appellant) Legal Services Branch, NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure (First and Third Respondents) Gadens Lawyers (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 32153 of 2012 Decision under appeal Citation: [2012] NSWLEC 4 Date of Decision: 2012-01-23 00:00:00 Before: Sheahan J File Number(s): 40219 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate