NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Australian & New Zealand Banking Group v RQA Accountants Pty Ltd & ors [2013] NSWSC 165 Hearing dates: 12 March 2013 Decision date: 21 March 2013 Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) An order for possession of the Property against the first and second defendants. (2) An order that the plaintiff have leave to issue a writ of possession forthwith. (3) That the defence filed 20 August 2012 be struck out. (4) Dismiss the whole of the first cross-claim filed on 22 August 2010. (5) Dismiss the first defendant's notice of motion filed on 3 September 2012. (6) Order the defendants to pay the costs of: (a) the plaintiff's motion filed on 29 November 2012; (b) the first defendant/cross-claimant's motion filed on 3 September 2012; (c) the cross-defendant's amended motion filed on 12 October 2012. Catchwords: PROCEDURE-application for summary judgment for possession of property-effect of clause in mortgage excluding reliance on defence, counter-claim or set-off in response to claim for possession of secured property PROCEDURE-application to strike out defence-whether defence discloses a reasonable cause of action per UCPR r. 14.28(1)(a) EQUITY- whether bank owes fiduciary duty to customer EQUITY-unconscionability-superior bargaining position of bank GUARANTEE-nature of bank guarantee- equivalent to cash Legislation Cited: - Civil Liability Act 2002, s 31 - Insurance Contracts Act 1982 (Cth), s 13, s 54 - National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth), sch 1 (National Credit Code), s 88 - Real Property Act 1900, s 57(2)(b), s 60 - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 13.1(1)(b), r. 14.26(1), r. 14.28(1)(a), r. 13.4 Cases Cited: - Adams v Bank of New South Wales [1984] 1 NSWLR 285 - Agar v Hyde [2000] HCA 41; 201 CLR 552 - Anthony John Sharp & Anor v Sphere Drake Insurance PLC & Ors [1992] 2 Lloyds Rep. 501 - Claude R. Ogden & Co Pty Ltd v Reliance Fire Sprinkler Co Pty Ltd [1975] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 52 - Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; 151 CLR 447 - Eureka 2 Holdings Pty Limited v Palasty [2010] NSWSC 526 - GE Capital Australia v Davis [2002] NSWSC 1146; 180 FLR 250 - Hammer Waste Pty Ltd v QBE Mercantile Mutual Ltd [2002] NSWSC 1006 - McGuirk v University of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 1424 - National Australia Bank Ltd v Hokit Pty Ltd [1996] NSWSC 198; 39 NSWLR 377 - National Australia Bank Ltd v Zaza [2009] WASC 314 - Permanent Custodians Ltd v AGB Developments Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 540 - QBE Mercantile Mutual Ltd v Hammer Waste Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 356 - Sullivan v Moody [2001] HCA 59; 207 CLR 562 - Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd [1986] AC 80 -The "Fedora" [1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 441 - Wood Hall Ltd v Pipeline Authority [1979] HCA 21; 141 CLR 443 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Australian & New Zealand Banking Group (Plaintiff/ First Applicant) Australian Associated Motor Insurers Limited (Cross-Defendant/Second Applicant) RQA Accountants Pty Ltd (First Defendant/First Respondent) Mr S Surana (Second Defendant/Second Respondent) Mrs S Surana (Third Defendant/Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Surana (in person and for the first and third defendants) S Docker (Plaintiff/ First Applicant) F T Roughley (Cross-Defendant/ Second Applicant) Solicitors: Kemp Strang (Plaintiff/ First Applicant) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (Cross-Defendant/ Second applicant) File Number(s): 2012/226249
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate