NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jacobs v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2013] NSWADT 54 Hearing dates: 26 February 2012 Decision date: 07 March 2013 Jurisdiction: General Division Before: P H Molony, Judicial Member Decision: 1. The application for an extension of time is refused. 2. The application for ADT Review is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Catchwords: Government Information Public Access - time for seeking ADT review - extension of time Legislation Cited: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Government Information (Public Access) Amendment Act 2012 Cases Cited: ANQ v Department of Attorney General and Justice, Corrective Services [2012] NSWADT 271 Edwards v Department of Family and Community Services [2012] NSWADT 60 R v Jacobs [2009] NSWSC 235 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Applicant - Greg Jacobs Respondent - Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force Representation: Applicant - in person Respondent - K Rose File Number(s): 123345 Publication restriction: Nil
reasons for decision
Introduction 1One 22 January, 2013 Mr Jacobs applied to the Tribunal to review a decision made by the Commissioner of Police (the Agency) on 18 April, 2012 under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (the GIPA Act). That was a reconsideration decision under s 93(3) and was made following a review of a previous internal review decision by the Office of the Information Commissioner. The Information Commissioner's reconsideration recommendations were made on 23 February 2012. 2On 4 December 2012 Mr Jacobs filed an application to review the decision of 18 April 2012 with the Tribunal. 3Following a planning meeting on 22 January, 2013 Mr Jacobs' application was set down for a preliminary hearing before me on 23 February, 2013 to determine: (a) whether Mr Jacobs' application to the Tribunal was out of time; and, (b) if so, whether the tribunal should extend time for the making of the application under section 101(4) of the GIPA Act. 4These reasons relate to those issues.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate