Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Steadman [2013] NSWSC 170

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Steadman [2013] NSWSC 170 Hearing dates: 15 February 2013 Decision date: 07 March 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 9(1) of the Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006, the defendant is subject to an extended supervision order that commences today, 7 March 2013, and expires after 3 years. (2) The conditions of the extended supervision order are those contained in the amended schedule filed by the plaintiff on 4 March 2013. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 - application for an extended supervision order - order not opposed except for duration - independent assessment of criteria contained in s 9(3) - defendant unwilling to undergo rehabilitation - defendant high-risk of re-offending - order imposed for 3 years Legislation Cited: Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 Cases Cited: State of New South Wales v Bastian [2011] NSWSC 641 State of New South Wales v Conway [2011] NSWSC 925 State of New South Wales v Darrego [2011] NSWSC 1449 State of New South Wales v Richardson (No. 2) [2011] NSWSC 276 State of New South Wales v Russell [2009] NSWSC 810 State of New South Wales v Scerri [2012] NSWSC 271 State of New South Wales v Watson [2011] NSWSC 1692 Tillman v Attorney General for the State of New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 327; (2007) 178 A Crim R 133 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Attorney General for the State of New South Wales (P) Robert Stanley Steadman, also known as Robert Stanley Stanton (D) Representation: Counsel: G Denman (P) P Johnson (D) Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office (NSW) (P) Legal Aid NSW (D) File Number(s): 2012/346094