NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cabport Pty Ltd v Marinchek [2013] NSWCA 51 Hearing dates: 25 February 2013 Decision date: 12 March 2013 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Barrett JA at [45]; Tobias AJA at [46] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Set aside the judgment for the respondent in the sum of $183,331.80. (3) Judgment for the respondent in the sum of $27,136.44, that judgment to take effect on 19 December 2011. (4) Set aside the orders for costs made by Olsson DCJ on 19 December 2011. (5) The respondent pay the appellant's costs of this appeal. (6) In relation to the costs of the proceedings before Hughes DCJ and Olsson DCJ, if the parties are unable to agree as to the orders to be made and do not file consent orders within 7 days of the date of these orders, the appellant should lodge with the Court and serve within 14 days of the date of those orders written submissions concerning the orders sought. The respondent should then lodge and serve any response within 7 days thereafter. The Court will determine what orders should be made on the basis of those written submissions. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: CONTRACT - building and construction - compromise - whether claims of alleged overcharging by appellant builder had been compromised and released under a settlement agreement between the parties - whether primary judge addressed correct questions given interpretation of settlement agreement adopted by this Court in Marinchek v Cabport Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 334 - whether primary judge erred in findings as to respondent's state of knowledge regarding circumstances giving rise to claims of overcharging - claims for recovery of alleged overpayments compromised and released Cases Cited: Barclays Bank Ltd v WJ Simms Son & Cook (Southern) Ltd [1980] QB 677 David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1992] HCA 48; 175 CLR 353 Marinchek v Cabport Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 334 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Cabport Pty Ltd (Appellant) Scott Marinchek (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J C Kelly SC, R Zikmann (Appellant) T Davie (Respondent) Solicitors: Norton Rose Australia (Appellant) Gillis Delaney Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/84955 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-12-19 00:00:00 Before: Olsson DCJ File Number(s): 2005/296071
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate