NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RWC v R [2013] NSWCCA 58 Hearing dates: 10 December 2012 Decision date: 13 March 2013 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at 1 Latham J at 2 Adamson J at 84 Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted 2. Appeal allowed 3. The convictions on counts 3 and 4 are quashed 4. Set aside the sentences imposed by O'Connor QC DCJ on 4 November 2011 5. Order a new trial on counts 3 and 4 Catchwords: APPEAL - appeal against conviction - unreasonable verdict - Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) - failure to give direction to jury - no inconsistency between "guilty" and "not guilty" verdicts in relation to multiple counts - jury's verdict not unreasonable - appellant denied a the chance of an acquittal on all counts by absence of a Markuleski direction - appellant denied right to a fair trial - leave to appeal granted on second ground of appeal - convictions quashed. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW) Cases Cited: AE v R [2008] NSWCCA 52 DF v R [2012] NSWCCA 171 Jones v The Queen [1997] HCA 56 ; 191 CLR 439 M v R [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 R v Ford [2006] QCA 142 R v Markuleski [2001] NSWCCA 290; 52 NSWLR 82 RWC v R [2010] NSWCCA 332 Category: Principal judgment Parties: RWC - (Applicant) Regina - (Respondent Crown) Representation: Counsel JA Griffin QC / AC Smith - (Applicant) N Noman SC - (Repondent Crown) Solicitors WE Kable - (Applicant) S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - (Respondent Crown) File Number(s): 2008/00017646016 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-11-11 00:00:00 Before: CE O'Connor QC DCJ File Number(s): 2008/00017646016
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate