NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Buksh v R [2013] NSWCCA 60 Hearing dates: 26 July 2012 Decision date: 11 April 2013 Before: Beazley P at [1] Hall J at [2] Campbell J at [3] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal; 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for leave to appeal against sentence - applicant charged with three counts of aggravated sexual intercourse without consent - plea of guilty - whether sentencing judge erred by applying a two-stage sentencing process discussed in R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Legislation Cited: -Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: -Application by the Attorney General [2004] NSWCCA 303; 61 NSWLR 305 -Butler v R [2012] NSWCCA 23 -Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 -Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 -R v AEM Snr; R v KEM; R v MM [2002] NSWCCA 58 -R v Gorman [2002] NSWCCA 516; 137 A Crim R 326 - R v Hammoud [2000] NSWCCA 540; 118 A Crim R 66 -R.v Lancaster (1991) 58 A Crim R 290 -R v Nichols (1991) 57 A Crim R 391 -R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nazir Buksh (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H K Dhanji SC (Applicant) J H Pickering (Respondent) Solicitors: Harish Prasad & Associates (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/350253 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-08-30 00:00:00 Before: Judge Keleman SC File Number(s): 2010/350253
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate