NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Liverpool City Council and Anor [2013] NSWLEC 33 Hearing dates: 1 and 8 March 2013 Decision date: 21 March 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Sheahan J Decision: See par [115] of this judgment Catchwords: EASEMENTS: Matter transferred from Supreme Court - summons under s 88K of the Conveyancing Act 1919 - applications for leave to amend the summons and for expedition of the hearing of the proceedings Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Conveyancing Act 1919 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Local Government Act 1993 Real Property Act 1900 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 Cases Cited: 117 York Street Pty Ltd v Proprietors of Strata Plan 16123 (1998) 43 NSWLR 504 Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; 239 CLR 175 Greetings Oxford Koala Hotel Pty Ltd v Oxford Square Investments Pty Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 33 Healthscope Ltd v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 237 Kennedy v Stockland Developments Pty Ltd (No 5) [2012] NSWLEC 21 Saad v City of Canterbury [2012] NSWSC 389 Tanlane Pty Ltd v Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1341 Tanlane Pty Ltd v Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 1286 Tanlane Pty Ltd v Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] NSWSC 90 Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Tanlane Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 445 Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2009] NSWLEC 100 Rainbowforce Pty Ltd v Skyton Holdings Pty Ltd [2010] NSWLEC 2, 171 LGERA 286 Valuer-General of New South Wales v In Adam Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 306 Vaughan v Dawson [2005] NSWSC 33 Wren Investments Pty Ltd v Hunter [2011] NSWLEC 122 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd (Applicant) Liverpool City Council (First Respondent) Tanlane Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Representation: T Robertson SC and J Lazarus (Applicant) J Hutton, barrister (1 March) and C Morton, solicitor (8 March) (First Respondent) T Hale SC and Z Steggall (Second Respondent) Mark McDonald & Associates Lawyers Pty Ltd (Applicant) Sparke Helmore (First Respondent) Minter Ellison (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 30141 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate