NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Semaan v Poidevin [2013] NSWSC 226 Hearing dates: 13/12/2012 and subsequent written submissions of 31/01/2013 and 06/03/2013 Decision date: 22 March 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) The order made by the Local Court of New South Wales on 4 April 2012 at Burwood convicting Richard Semaan of the offence of resist a police officer in the execution of his or her duty, contrary to s 546C of the Crimes Act 1900, be set aside; (2) The charge against Richard Semaan, being that on 14 September 2011 at Auburn, he did resist Sergeant Poidevin, a member of the Police Force in the execution of his duty, is dismissed; (3) No order for costs. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - resist police officer in execution of duty - mens rea - honest and reasonable mistaken belief of fact - effect of s 201 of Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 Legislation Cited: Australian Federal Police Act 1979 (Cth) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes Act 1900 Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 Cases Cited: Albert v Lavin [1982] AC 546 Assadourian v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (Northern Region) [2011] NSWSC 1052 Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v X [2000] NSWCA 199; (2000) 49 NSWLR 653 Australian Gaslight Co v Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 Beckwith v R [1976] HCA 55; (1976) 135 CLR 569 Bradley v Commonwealth [1973] HCA 34; (1973) 128 CLR 557 Chappell v A Ross & Sons Pty Ltd [1969] VR 376 Coleman v Power [2004] HCA 39; (2004) 220 CLR 1 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Ltd [1996] HCA 36; (1996) 186 CLR 389 Collector of Customs v Pressure Tankers Pty Ltd and Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 322; (1993) 43 FCR 280 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Gribble (2004) 151 A Crim R 256 Farah Constructions v Say-Dee [2007] HCA 22; (2007) 230 CLR 89 Farrell v Alexander [1977] AC 59 Geelong Harbour Trust Commissioners v Gibbs Bright & Co [1974] UKPCHCA 1; (1974) 129 CLR 576 Gollan v Nugent [1988] HCA 59; (1988) 166 CLR 18 Hardgrave v R [1906] HCA 47; (1906) 4 CLR 232 Hayes v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1956] HCA 21; (1956) 96 CLR 47 Hayward-Jackson v Mason-Walshaw [2012] WASC 107 He Kaw Teh v R [1985] HCA 43; (1985) 157 CLR 523 Hunter Resources Ltd v Melville [1988] HCA 5; (1988) 164 CLR 234 Jones v Daire (1983) 32 SASR 369 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 32; (2010) 241 CLR 390 Krakouer v R [1998] HCA 43; (1998) 194 CLR 202 Krishna v DPP (NSW) [2007] NSWCCA 318 L & B Linings Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2011] NSWSC 474 Leon Fink Holdings Pty Ltd v Australian Film Commission [1979] HCA 26; (1979) 141 CLR 672 Leonard v Morris (1975) 10 SASR 528 McLiney v Minister [1911] VLR 347 Nelson v Nelson [1995] HCA 25; (1995) 184 CLR 538 Plunkett v Kroemer [1934] SASR 124 Project Blue Sky Inc & Ors v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Proudman v Dayman [1941] HCA 28; (1941) 67 CLR 536 Public Service Association of New South Wales v Industrial Commission of New South Wales (1985) 1 NSWLR 627 R v Reynhoudt [1962] HCA 23; (1962) 107 CLR 381 Re K (1993) 46 FCR 336 Williams v DPP [2011] NSWSC 1085 Yango Pastoral Company Pty Ltd v First Chicago Australia Ltd [1978] HCA 42; (1978) 139 CLR 410 Texts Cited: Wigmore, Evidence in Trials at Common Law Section 2 (Peter Tillers ed. 1983) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Richard Semaan (Plaintiff) Sergeant Damien Poidevin (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Dennis (Plaintiff) N Adams SC (Defendant) Solicitors: Nyman Gibson Stewart (Plaintiff) Crown Solicitor's Office (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/149182 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9109 Date of Decision: 2012-04-04 00:00:00 Before: Connell LCM
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate