NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Carmel Mary Spillane v Denis John Hall [2013] NSWSC 229 Hearing dates: 22 March 2013 Decision date: 22 March 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Sackar J Decision: See paragraph [27] Catchwords: SUCCESSION - executors and administrators - whether executors entitled to refrain from incurring further expense in the administration of the estate until put in funds or granted indemnity - whether proceedings should be presently stayed. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 Probate and Administration Act 1898 Succession Act 2006 Cases Cited: Balkin v Peck (1998) 43 NSWLR 706 Bird v Bird (No 4) [2012] NSWSC 648 Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) v Bone (1976) 135 CLR 233 Countryside (No 3) Pty Ltd v Best [2001] NSWSC 1152 Grace v Grace [2012] NSWSC 976 Hardoon v Belilios [1901] AC 118 Re Atkinson [1971] VR 613 Re Burbidge (No 2) (NSWSC, Young J, 25 June 1993, unreported) Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Carmel Mary Spillane (Plaintiff) Denis John Hall (First Defendant) Bruce Burge (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D J Jenkins (Plaintiff) A Lakeman (Defendants) Solicitors: Baker Deane & Nutt (Plaintiff) HWL Ebsworth (Defendants) File Number(s): 2011/370165
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate