NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Iskandar v Mahbur & Ors [2013] NSWSC 239 Hearing dates: 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18 and 27 February 2013; 6 March 2013 Decision date: 26 March 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Bergin CJ in Eq Decision: Amended Statement of Claim dismissed Catchwords: [DECEIT] - where plaintiff claims he was deceived into believing that it was necessary to grant a Power of Attorney to his brother to implement his instructions as to transaction in relation to his Taxi whilst he was incarcerated - where claim that brother and others had no intention of implementing the plaintiff's instructions but rather intended to steal the plaintiff's money. [UNDUE INFLUENCE] - where plaintiff incarcerated for lengthy term of imprisonment - whether relationship of ascendency over the plaintiff - whether plaintiff unable to make worthwhile judgment in relation to the grant of the Power of Attorney - whether Power of Attorney procured by undue influence. [UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT] - where plaintiff claims a special disability - dependence on defendants - luring of plaintiff into granting of Power of Attorney. Legislation Cited: NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 Powers of Attorney Act 2003 Cases Cited: Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 Brusewitz v Brown [1923] NZLR 1106 Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio Ltd (1983) 151 CLR 447 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 Iskandar v Mahbur (No 6) (unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Slattery J, 15 February 2012) Iskandar v Mahbur (No 9) (unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, White J, 10 December 2012) Johnston v Buttress (1936) 56 CLR 113 Krakowski v Eurolynx Properties Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 563 Louth v Diprouse (1992) 175 CLR 621 Neat Holdings Pty Limited v Karajan Holdings Pty Limited (1992) 110 ALR 449; 67 ALJR 170 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hazairin Iskandar (Plaintiff) Zulfikri Mahbur (First Defendant) Aminah Theglory (Second Defendant) Wahyu Sasterawan (Third Defendant) (by his tutor, NSW Trustee and Guardian) Representation: FD Coyne (Plaintiff) Submitting Appearance (First Defendant) A Cheshire (Second Defendant) AJ McInerney SC (Third Defendant) Sylvester and Browne (Plaintiff) Goldrick Farrell Mullan (Second Defendant) Zucker Legal (Third Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/122386
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate