NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cvetkovic v R [2013] NSWCCA 66 Hearing dates: 5 March 2013 Decision date: 03 April 2013 Before: Price J at [1] McCallum J at [2] Schmidt J at [90] Decision: Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Criminal procedure - Appeal - Appeal out of time - Applicant with major depressive illness - Extension of time granted
CRIMINAL LAW - Sentence appeal - Wounding with intent to murder - No error demonstrated or grounds upon which less sever sentence warranted Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Standard Minimum Sentencing) Act 2002 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Appeal Rules Cases Cited: Christodoulou v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 102 Cvetkovic v R [2010] NSWCCA 329 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; (2010) 79 NSWLR 1 Hili v R; Jones v R [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Cool (NSWCCA, 2 June 1994, unreported) R v Glencourse (1995) 78 A Crim R 256 R v Hamid [2006] NSWCCA 302; (2006) 164 A Crim R 179 R v Macadam-Kellie [2001] NSWCCA 170 R v Quach [2002] NSWCCA 173 R v Roberts (NSWCCA 8 March 1994, unreported) R v Sinclair (NSWCCA, 4 March 1998, unreported) R v Zegura [2006] NSWCCA 230 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dragan Cvetkovic (appellant) Crown (respondent) Representation: Counsel: Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2008/1107 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2009-08-07 00:00:00 Before: Sweeney DCJ File Number(s): 2008/1107
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate