NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mainteck Services Pty Limited v Stein Heurtey SA and Stein Heurtey Australia Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 266 Hearing dates: 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 July 2012, further oral submissions on 29 October 2012, further written submissions 31 October 2012 Decision date: 28 March 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Sackar J Decision: See paragraphs [307] - [308] Catchwords: PROCEDURE - principles regarding the adoption of a referee's report - whether referee's report should be adopted or rejected in part - whether the plaintiff should be permitted to withdraw an admission in relation to the referee's report.
CONTRACTS - construction and interpretation of contracts - whether contract void for uncertainty - courts should be astute to adopt a construction which will preserve the validity of a contract.
EVIDENCE - findings of fact - whether findings in referee's report are unreasonable or perverse. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Bellevarde Constructions Pty Ltd v Cpc Energy Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 228 BestCare Foods v Origin Energy [2012] NSWSC 574 Bitannia Pty Ltd v Parkline Constructions Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1302 Calin v Greater Union Organisation Pty Ltd (1991) 173 CLR 33 Chocolate Factory Apartments v Westpoint Finance and Ors [2005] NSWSC 784 Corbett Court Pty Ltd v Quasar Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1163 Helmos Enterprises Pty Ltd v Jaylor Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 235 Hocking v Bell (1945) 71 CLR 430 Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 Mamidoil-Jetoil Greek Petroleum Co SA v Okta Crude Oil Refinery AD [2001] 2 Lloyd's Rep 76 Meehan v Jones (1982) 149 CLR 571 New South Wales v Bovis Lend Lease Pty Limited [2007] NSWSC 1045 Sangain Pty Ltd v Italform Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 74 Seven Sydney v Fuji Xerox [2004] NSWSC 902 Sudbrook Trading Estate Ltd v Eggleton [1983] 1 AC 444 Thorby v Goldberg (1964) 112 CLR 597 Upper Hunter County District Council v Australian Chilling & Freezing Co Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 429 Texts Cited: K Lewison and D Hughes, The Interpretation of Contracts in Australia, (2012) Lawbook Co Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mainteck Services Pty Limited - plaintiff Stein Heurtey SA and Ors - first defendant Stein Heutey Australia Pty Ltd - second defendant Representation: Counsel: F Corsaro SC, F G Kalyk - plaintiff P W Taylor SC, J T G Gibson - defendants Solicitors: Piper Alderman - plaintiff Jones Day - defendants File Number(s): 2007/266650
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate