NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Prismex Technologies Pty Limited; Colin Lindsay Taggert v John Matyear [2013] NSWSC 278 Hearing dates: 5 February 2013 Decision date: 05 February 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Affidavit in question does not unfairly prejudice the applicants and is read into evidence Catchwords: EVIDENCE - affidavits and statutory declarations - affidavits - whether late service of affidavit creates unfair prejudice EVIDENCE - affidavits and statutory declarations - affidavits - whether statements contained in affidavit constitute hearsay EVIDENCE - affidavits and statutory declarations - affidavits - whether partial redaction of exhibit to affidavit renders it inadmissible Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: 2006/ 258477 John Matyear (First Applicant) Metage Pty Ltd (Second Applicant) Prismex Technologies Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Mendela Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) X-Position Pty Ltd (Third Respondent) 2012/ 311698 Taggart, Colin Lindsay (First Plaintiff) Mendela Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) X-Position Pty Ltd (Third Plaintiff) Matyear, John (First Defendant) Metage Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: 2006/ 258477 Ms J E Richards (Applicants) Mr M Ashhurst SC (Respondents) Solicitors: 2006/ 258477 Farrar Lawyers (Applicants) Cornwall Stodart (Respondents) File Number(s): 2006/ 258477 2012/ 311698
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate