NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ADZIOSKI v R [2013] NSWCCA 69 Hearing dates: 13 March 2013 Decision date: 05 April 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL [1] Slattery J at [77] Bellew J at [78] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - attempted sexual intercourse, victim with a cognitive impairment - offender suffering from mental illness - whether sentencing judge assessed offender's moral culpability - need to adjust competing considerations in sentencing exercise - whether appropriate weight given to offender's mental illness - whether sentencing judge treated victim's vulnerability arising from her cognitive impairment as an aggravating feature - whether sentence manifestly excessive. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 - s61H(1A), s61J(1), s61O(1A) Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Application under section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518; 56 NSWLR 146 Benitez v R [2006] NSWCCA 21; 160 A Crim R 166 Carroll v The Queen [2009] HCA 13; 83 ALJR 579 Cole v R [2010] NSWCCA 227 Courtney v R [2007] NSWCCA 195 Devaney v R [2012] NSWCCA 285 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; 205 A Crim R 1 Everett v R [1994] HCA 49; 181 CLR 295 Graham v R [2009] NSWCCA 212 Lowndes v R [1999] HCA 29; 195 CLR 665 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 240 CLR 120 Papworth v R [2011] NSWCCA 253 R v Allpass [1993] 72 A Crim R 561 R v Burnett [2011] NSWCCA 276 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 R v Wright (1997) 93 A Crim R 48 Taylor v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 7 Veen v R (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; 164 CLR 465 Yang v R [2012] NSWCCA 49 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Steven Adzioski - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr G Brady - Applicant Ms S Dowling - Respondent Crown Solicitors: Nyman Gibson Stewart - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2009/279776 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-04-05 00:00:00 Before: Zahra DCJ File Number(s): 2010/352037
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate