NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: ML v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2013] NSWSC 283 Hearing dates: 30 - 31/01/2013 Decision date: 03 April 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Summons and proceedings dismissed; (2) The plaintiff shall pay the first defendant's costs of and incidental to the proceedings, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - inherent jurisdiction of the Court - application for stay of disciplinary proceedings pending possible criminal proceedings - whether jurisdiction ousted by s 9 of Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) - public interest in disciplinary proceedings - any unfair prejudice capable of being protected otherwise - summons dismissed Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Supreme Court Act 1970 Cases Cited: Australian Securities & Investments Commission in the matter of Northwest Resources Limited v Craigside Company Limited BVI company number 74124 named in the Schedule [2013] FCA 201 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v HLP Financial Planning (Aust) Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1868; (2007) 164 FCR 487 Australian Securities Commission v Kavanagh (1993) 12 ACSR 69 Baker v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police [2000] FCA 1339; (2000) 104 FCR 359 Bannister v Director-General Department of Corrective Services [2002] QSC 469; (2002) 146 A Crim R 453 Ceasar v Sommer [1980] 2 NSWLR 929 Connelly v Director of Public Prosecutions [1964] AC 1254 Elliot v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority [2004] FCA 586 Hammond v Commonwealth of Australia [1982] HCA 42; (1982) 152 CLR 188 Herron v McGregor (1986) 6 NSWLR 246 Johnston v Cameron [2002] FCA 948 Kirk v Industrial Commission of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1; (2010) 239 CLR 531 Legal Services Commissioner v Brereton (Legal Practice) [2008] VCAT 1341 McMahon v Gould (1982) 7 ACLR 202 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 R v CB; MP v R [2011] NSWCCA 264 R v Seller; R v McCarthy [2013] NSWCCA 42 Re AWB Ltd (No 1) [2008] VSC 473; (2008) 21 VR 252 Sage v Australian Securities Investments Commission [2005] FCA 1043 SD v New South Wales Crime Commission [2013] NSWCA 48 Smith v Selwyn [1914] 3 KB 98 Category: Principal judgment Parties: ML (Plaintiff) Australian Securities and Investment Commission (First Defendant) Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R F Sutherland SC / M Castle (Plaintiff) N J Williams SC / PD Herzfeld (First Defendant) Submitting appearance (Second Defendant) Solicitors: Armstrong Legal (Plaintiff) Australian Securities and Investment Commission (First Defendant) Australian Government Solicitor (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/354424 Publication restriction: The plaintiff's name or any information identifying the plaintiff will not be published until the conclusion of any criminal proceedings
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate