NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Murray v Woollahra Municipal Council [2013] NSWLEC 40 Hearing dates: 28 March 2013 Decision date: 28 March 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Craig J Decision: Orders as set out at [24] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - notice to produce - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 21.10 - necessity for document to be relevant to a fact in issue - production of legal advices sought - proceedings challenge validity of development consent - Council interpretation of "height" in planning instrument challenged - Council's interpretation based on legal advice - determination of height jurisdictional - advice received by Council not relevant to a fact in issue - motion dismissed Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 1995 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: John Murray (First Applicant) Wendy Murray (Second Applicant) Woollahra Municipal Council (First Respondent) Debra Ann Klein (Second Respondent) Representation: S Duggan SC with S Nash (Applicants) I J Hemmings (First Respondent) J E Robson SC (Second Respondent) Comino Prassas Solicitors (Applicants) Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (First Respondent) Susan Hill & Associates Lawyers (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 41236 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate