NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Dymocks Book Arcade Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 298 Hearing dates: 4 February 2013 Decision date: 07 February 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Leave to withdraw admissions granted. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Admissions - leave to withdraw admissions - whether admissions wrongly and/or inadvertently made - balance of prejudice - whether prejudice to opponent outweighs desirability of hearing case on true legal basis Legislation Cited: (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974, s52 (NSW) Civil Liability Act 2002, s 34(1)(a) (NSW) Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Pt 4C (NSW) Fair Trading Act 1987, s 42 (NSW) Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946, s5(1)(c) Cases Cited: Baldry v Jackson (1976) 2 NSWLR 415 Drabsch v Switzerland General Insurance Company Limited NSWSC (16 October 1996) (unreported) Dymocks v Capral [2010] NSWSC 195 Hill End Gold Limited v First Tiffany Resources Corporation [2008] NSWSC 866 Jeans v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Limited (2003) 204 ALR 327 Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61390 v Multiplex Corporate Agency Pty Limited (No 1) [2012] NSWSC 298 Silver v Dome Resources NL [2005] NSWSC 265 SLE Worldwide Australia Pty Limited v Wyatt Gallagher Bassett Pty Limited [2005] NSWSC 816 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Dymocks Book Arcade Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Capral Limited (First Defendant) Peter Dalton Architects Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: DA Hughes (Plaintiff) LW Chan (Second Defendant) Solicitors: Norton Rose Australia (Plaintiff) Colin Biggers & Paisley (First Defendant) Kennedys (Australasia) Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2009/ 298893-008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate