Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Court of Criminal Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Legg v R [2013] NSWCCA 74
Hearing dates: 21/03/2013
Decision date: 21 March 2013
Before: Basten JA; Simpson J; Blanch J
Decision: (1) Appeal allowed.
(2) Conviction quashed.
(3) New trial ordered.
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - first ground of appeal conceded - appeal allowed - conviction quashed and new trial ordered
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900
Category: Principal judgment
Parties: Christopher David Legg (Applicant)
Regina (Respondent)
Representation: Counsel:
T Gartelmann (Applicant)
M M Cinque (Respondent)
Solicitors:
Tully & Chiper Lawyers (Applicant)
S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2009/202060
Publication restriction: Non publication of any information or material that may lead to the identification of the complainant (s 15A Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987)
Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101
Date of Decision: 2011-11-16 00:00:00
Before: Nicholson DCJ
File Number(s): 2009/202060
Judgment
1THE COURT (DELIVERED BY SIMPSON J): The appellant appeals against his conviction on 11 November 2011 in respect of a charge of persistent sexual abuse of a child brought under s 66EA(1) of the Crimes Act 1900. Four grounds of appeal were identified, the most substantial of which (that the verdict was unreasonable) was at the hearing abandoned.
2The first ground of appeal concerns the procedures undertaken by the trial judge in allowing the complainant to give unsworn evidence. Detailed submissions concerning this ground were placed in writing before the Court and the Crown has conceded that the ground is substantiated and that, as a result, the appeal against conviction should be allowed, the conviction quashed and a new trial ordered. That being the case counsel for the appellant did not seek to press the remaining pleaded grounds.
3All members of the Court have read the written submissions and the concession made by the Crown and are satisfied that the concession is properly made and ought to be accepted by the Court.
4Accordingly, the orders of the Court are the appeal is allowed, the conviction is quashed and a new trial is ordered.
**********
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
Decision last updated: 08 February 2016