NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Duncan v The Honourable David Andrew Ipp AO QC and Ors [2013] NSWSC 314 Hearing dates: 22 March 2013 Decision date: 10 April 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Administrative Law Before: Hoeben CJ at CL Decision: Plaintiff's summons dismissed. Plaintiff to pay the Attorney-General's costs of the application. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - natural justice - rule against bias - apprehended bias - test for - actions of Commissioner of Independent Commission Against Corruption in course of a public inquiry - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - bias by prejudgment - public inquiry by Independent Commission Against Corruption into granting of Mining Exploration Leases - contact between Commissioner and Departments of Government - provision of legal advice by Commissioner to Departments of Government - request by Commissioner that project approval not be granted until report made by Commission - statements by Commissioner that no factual findings yet made - application for injunction against Commissioner by potential beneficiary if Mining Lease granted - INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION - significance of broad investigatory and inquisitorial functions and powers - how principles of apprehended bias by a prejudgment apply to such a body - whether contact with government bodies by a Commissioner and provision of advice provided basis for claim of bias by prejudgment - no basis for claim of bias by prejudgment established. Legislation Cited: Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Mining Act 1992 (NSW) Cases Cited: CUR 24 v DPP [2012] NSWCA 65 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337 Gwandalan Summerland Point Action Group Inc v Minister for Planning & Ors [2010] 75 NSWLR 269 Keating v Morris & Ors [2005] QSC 243 McGovern v Ku-ring-gai Council [2008] NSWCA 209; 72 NSWLR 504 Michael Wilson and Partners Ltd v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman [1980] HCA 13; 144 CLR 13 R v Carter and Attorney General(Tas) (unreported), Supreme Court of Tasmania, Full Court, October 1991 Webb v The Queen [1994] HCA 30; 181 CLR 41 Wentworth v Rogers [2000] NSWCA 368 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Travers William Duncan - Plaintiff The Honourable David Andrew Ipp AO QC - First Defendant Independent Commission Against Corruption - Second Defendant Attorney General of NSW - Third Defendant Representation: Counsel: Mr N Hutley SC/Mr G Ng/Mr A Gerard - Plaintiff Submitting Appearance - 1st and 2nd Defendants Mr B Walker SC/Mr S Free - 3rd Defendant Solicitors: Yeldham Price O'Brien Lusk - Plaintiff IV Knight, Crown Solicitor (NSW) - 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants File Number(s): 2013/68363
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate