NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Thompson-Davis v R [2013] NSWCCA 75 Hearing dates: 24/7/2012 Decision date: 11 April 2013 Before: Beazley P at [1] Hall J at [2] Campbell J at [3] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal; (2) Allow the appeal; (3) Quash the sentence imposed on the applicant by the District Court on 1st April 2010 and instead sentence the applicant to a non-parole period of 3 years and 10 months imprisonment taken to have commenced on 4th March 2010 and expiring on 3rd January 2014, with an additional term of 2 years and 6 months imprisonment commencing on 4th January 2014 and expiring on 3rd July 2016; the earliest date for release on parole is therefore 3rd January 2014. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for leave to appeal against sentence - applicant charged with break and enter with intent to commit indecent assault - further offences of committing an act of indecency and stalking on the Form 1 - guilty plea - whether sentencing judge erred by taking into account an irrelevant consideration - whether sentence manifestly excessive - whether sentencing judge erred by inverting the sentencing process required by Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 - whether the Court should re-sentence the applicant or remit the matter for re-sentencing. Legislation Cited: -Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) -Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) -Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) -Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) -Judicial Officers Act 1986 (NSW) Cases Cited: -Attorney General's Application [2002] NSWCCA 518; 56 NSWLR 146 -Dinsdale v. The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 -Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth) v. De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; 243 FLR 28 -Hili v. The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 -Ho v. Director of Public Prosecutions (1995) 37 NSWLR 393 -House v. The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 -Marshall v. R. [2007] NSWCCA 24 -Muldrock v. The Queen [2011] 39 HCA; 244 CLR 120 -Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 - R v Hammoud (2000) 118 A Crim R 66 -R. v. Shillingsworth [2003] NSWCCA 272 -R. v. Sutton [2004] NSWCCA 225 -Veen v. The Queen [No. 2] [1988] HCA 14; 164 CLR 465 -Wong v. The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 -YS v. R. [2010] NSWCCA 98 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hector Anthony James Thompson-Davis (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: A Francis (Applicant) H M Wilson (Respondent) Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/193612 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-04-01 00:00:00 Before: Judge Toner SC
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate