NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: ABD Holdings Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2013] NSWLEC 45 Hearing dates: 15 November 2012 Decision date: 09 April 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Sheahan J Decision: (1)The Council's Notice of Motion is dismissed, (2)The respondent Council is ordered to pay the applicant's costs of the motion, unless within 14 days it files and serves a Notice of Motion seeking a different costs order, (3)The Exhibit may be returned, (4)The matter will be listed before the Registrar for further case management on Friday 12 April 2013. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT MODIFICATION: application by respondent for the dismissal of the modification application made to the court, on the grounds of abuse of process - existing consent embodied in consent orders made by the court - considerations to apply Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: ABD Holdings Pty Limited v City of Sydney Council [2012] NSWLEC 1261 Arkibuilt Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2006] NSWLEC 502 Australian Leisure and Hospitality Group Pty Ltd v Manly Council (No 4) [2009] 172 LGERA 1 Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2006] HCA 27; 226 CLR 256 Blair & Perpetual Trustee Co Limited v Curran (Adam's Will) (1939) 62 CLR 464 Edwards v The Hills Shire Council [2009] NSWLEC 187 Hanna v Council of the City of Ryde [2011] NSWLEC 74 Makram Constructions Pty Limited v North Sydney Council [2002] NSWLEC 4; 119 LGERA 42 Metropolitan Bank Limited v Pooley (1884-5) LR 10 AppCas 210 Nikolaidis v Pittwater Council [2009] NSWLEC 227; 171 LGERA 104 Ord v Ord [1923] 2 KB 432 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 Progress & Securities Pty Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council (1988) 66 LGRA 236 Ridgeway v The Queen [1995] HCA 66; 184 CLR 19 Rogers v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 251 Russo v Kogarah Municipal Council [1999] NSWCA 303, 105 LGERA 290 Williams v Spautz [1992] HCA 34; 174 CLR 509 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: ABD Holdings Pty Ltd (Applicant) Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Ms S Duggan SC (Applicant) Mr P Clay SC (Respondent) Gadens Lawyers (Applicant) Legal & Governance Division, Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent) File Number(s): 11016 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate