NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tetra Pak Manufacturing v Challenger Life Nominees [2013] NSWSC 349 Hearing dates: 25/03/2013, 26/03/2013, 27/03/2013 Decision date: 16 April 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: McDougall J Decision: Separate questions answered (see at [110]). Proceedings dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACTS - indemnity clause - construction of indemnity clause - indemnity not to be construed as extending beyond the assigned risk unless words intractable.
CONTRACTS - indemnity clause - onus of proof - party relying on indemnity clause bears the onus of establishing it applies.
EVIDENCE - standard of proof - on balance of probabilities - whether land contaminated with particular pollutant at time of sale - tribunal of fact must feel actual persuasion - date of relevant spill not established by the evidence. Legislation Cited: Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Blatch v Archer (1774) 98 ER 969 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Nguyen v Cosmopolitan Homes [2008] NSWCA 246 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tetra Pak Manufacturing Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Challenger Life Nominees Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: TGR Parker SC / JAC Potts (Plaintiff) JB Simpkins SC / JR Williams (Defendant) Solicitors: Allens (Plaintiff) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/15762
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate