NSW Caselaw
Medical Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Balafas v Medical Council of NSW [2013] NSWMT 4 Hearing dates: 18 and 19 March 2013 Decision date: 19 April 2013 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Levy SC DCJ
Dr E Kok Dr B Westmore Ms D Robinson Decision: See paragraphs [107] - [111] for orders. Catchwords: MEDICAL TRIBUNAL - application for review of earlier deregistration orders - whether case for reinstatement has been made out Legislation Cited: Medical Practice Act 1994, s 66 Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW), s 125, s 126, s 127, s 163(2), s 163A and s 163B Cases Cited: Dinakar v Medical Council of NSW, unreported, 12 December 2012 HCCC v Balafas, unreported, 18 June 2010 Re Mansour Haider Zaidi [2006] NSWMT 6 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr John Andrew Balafas (Applicant) Medical Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr E Pike (Applicant) Ms K Richardson (Respondent) Browns (Applicant) IV Knight, Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 40023/12 Publication restriction: No
REASONS FOR DECISION
Table of Contents Application for reinstatement as a medical practitioner [1] - [3] Reasons for applicant's deregistration on 18 June 2010 [4] - [7] Issues [8] - [10] Principles to be applied on an application for reinstatement [11] - [12] Applicant's medical training and work history [13] - [17] Summary of events leading to applicant's deregistration [18] - [23] Disciplinary history leading to 2010 Medical Tribunal hearing [24] - [29] Complaints arising after deregistration [30] Overview of applicant's pursuit of rehabilitation [31] - [36] Evidence in support of application [37] - [88] Mr John Balafas - applicant [38] - [42] Dr Keith Roberts - treating psychiatrist [43] - [48] Dr Alex Wodak - treating addiction specialist [49] - [63] Dr Michel Diamond - consultant psychiatrist [64] - [82] Associate Prof Stephen Jurd - psychiatrist [83] - [85] Applicant's wife [86] - [88] Consideration of the issues [89] - [106] Orders [107] - [108] Practice conditions [109] Health conditions [110] Review conditions [111]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate