NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Mulsanne Resources Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 358 Hearing dates: Monday 11 March 2013 Decision date: 11 March 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Claim for privilege upheld and access to document refused Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - application to stay liquidators examinations as abuse of process - objection to notice to produce - client legal privilege - whether there are reasonable grounds for thinking that the document in question might evidence an abuse of process - whether claim for privilege maintainable Legislation Cited: (NSW) Evidence Act 1995, s 11(2), s 125 Cases Cited: Citicorp Australia Ltd v Cirillo [2000] SASC 219 Dataquest (Australia Pty Ltd) v Dataquest Inc (unreported, FCA, Tamberlin J 8 August 1996) Georgeski v Owners of Strata Plan 9833 [2004] NSWSC 945 In re Daintrey [1893] 2 QB 116 Kang v Kwan (2002) 11 BPR 20,623 Pitts v Adney (1961) 78 WN (NSW) 886 Van Der Lee v State of New South Wales [2002] NSWCA 286 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Nathan Leslie Tinkler (First Applicant) Troy Allan Palmer (Second Applicant) Matthew Thomas McClelland Keen (Third Applicant) Amy Louise Hyde (Fourth Applicant) Proper Officer of Aston Resources Investments P/L (Fifth Applicant) Blackwood Corporation Ltd (Plaintiff) Mulsanne Resources P/L (in liq) (Defendant) Robyn Louise Duggan and John Melluish as liquidators of Mulsanne Resources Pty Ltd (Respondents) Representation: Counsel: A Leopald SC w V Whittaker (Applicants) C R Newlinds SC w D Sulan (Respondents) Solicitors: DLA Piper Australia (Applicants) Clayton Utz (Respondents) File Number(s): 2012/ 296966
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate