NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v CJ [2013] NSWDC 40 Hearing dates: 25,26,27 February, 4,5, March 2013 Decision date: 14 March 2013 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Judge Williams Decision: Not Guilty on the grounds of mental illness Catchwords: Judge alone trial - 21 sexual offences by a female offender against juveniles - mental illness - facts not disputed - issue of bipolar disorder - issue of wrongness - competing psychiatric opinions - relevance of DSM IV Legislation Cited: Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act Civil Liability Act Crimes Act Cases Cited: R v M'Naghten (1833) 8 ER 718 R v Radford (1985) 42 SASR 266 R v Fernando [2011] NSWSC 1556 R v Jennings [2005] NSWSC 789 R v Porter (1936) 55 CLR 182 Sodeman v R [1936] 55 CLR 192 R v Weeks [1993] 66 A Crim R 466 Willgoss v R (1960) 105 CLR 295 R v Codere (1916) Cr App R 21 R v Hodges (1985) 19 A Crim R 129 Texts Cited: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM IV), Crime and Mental Health Law in NSW Howard & Westmore NSW Criminal Trial Courts Bench Book Category: Principal judgment Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions CJ Representation: DPP: Ms S Herbert , Def: Mr R Cavanaugh
Solicitor for Public Prosecutions Baker & Borthwick, Tuncurry File Number(s): 2010/17430 2010/00017810 Publication restriction: A non-publication order applies to anything that might identify any complainant or other young person or the school from which they came.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate