NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Fahda [2013] NSWCCA 86 Hearing dates: 11/12/2012 Decision date: 26 April 2013 Before: Simpson J at [1] Fullerton J at [44] Davies J at [149] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal against sentence - murder - whether sentence is manifestly inadequate - whether sentencing judge erred in assessment of objective seriousness of offence - whether sentencing judge erred in assessing respondent's prospects of rehabilitation - whether sentencing judge erred in assessing extent of respondent's intellectual impairment - whether sentencing judge erred in approach to respondent's mental illness Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Firearms Act 1996 Cases Cited: Beldon v R [2012] NSWCCA 194 Bugmy v R [1990] HCA 18; 169 CLR 525 Devaney v R [2012] NSWCCA 285 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; 79 NSWLR 1; 205 A Crim R 1 Fardon v Attorney-General (Qld) [2004] HCA 46; 223 CLR 575 Hanania v R [2012] NSWCCA 220 Hili v R; Jones v R [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Koloamatangi [2011] NSWCCA 288 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Ng v R [2011] NSWCCA 227; 214 A Crim R 191 Nguyen v R [2007] NSWCCA 363; 180 A Crim R 267 R v Borg [2010] NSWSC 951 R v Cooper [2005] NSWSC 791 R v Edwards [2009] NSWSC 164 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v George [2004] NSWCCA 247; 149 A Crim R 38 R v Harvey [2007] NSWSC 871 R v Heffernan [2005] NSWSC 739 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Hillsley [2006] NSWCCA 312; 164 A Crim R 252 R v Holcroft [2010] NSWSC 1294 R v Jones [2010] NSWSC 432 R v KB; R v JL; R v RJB [2011] NSWCCA 190 R v Koloamatangi [2011] NSWCCA 288 R v Mulato [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Nelson (Court of Criminal Appeal, 25 June 1996, unreported) R v Pocock [2008] NSWSC 1435 R v Robinson [2002] NSWCCA 359 R v Saalfeld [2007] NSWSC 376 R v Shamouil [2009] NSWSC 24 R v Shepherd [2006] NSWSC 799 R v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 112; 153 A Crim R 257 R v Windle [2012] NSWCCA 222 Versluys v R [2008] NSWCCA 76 Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Crown Mohammed Fahda (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Cinque/L Mathias (Crown) J Stratton SC (Respondent) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Legal Aid Commission of New South Wales (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/39990 Decision under appeal Citation: [2012] NSWSC 114 Date of Decision: 2012-02-24 00:00:00 Before: Harrison J File Number(s): 2009/39990
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate