NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Independent Transport Safety Regulator v Australian Rail Track Corporation Ltd. [2013] NSWIRComm 31 Hearing dates: 5 April 2013 (Written Submissions 18 April 2013) Decision date: 23 April 2013 Jurisdiction: Industrial Court of NSW Before: Haylen J Decision: (1) The defendant, Australian Rail Track Corporation Ltd, is found guilty of a breach of s 8(1) of the Rail Safety Act 2008, as particularised in the Amended Application for Order in Matter IRC 550 of 2012, to which the defendant entered a plea of guilty. (2) The defendant is fined the sum of $160,000 with half that amount of be paid to the prosecutor by way of moiety. (3) The defendant is to pay the costs of the prosecutor in a sum as agreed or, in the absence of agreement, as assessed. Catchwords: RAIL SAFETY ACT 2008 - s 8(1) - work team performing duties in rail corridor - fatal injuries received by team member when train unexpectedly appears at fixed work site - guilty plea entered - numerous failures in otherwise detailed safety system - failure to close line to be worked upon - failure to comply with system for closing line - failure to adequately audit and monitor safety communications - failure to use secondary safety system of flags and detonators near work site - safety rules capable of being read separately when required to be read together - failure of supervision at work site when Protection Officer required to implement secondary safety system - unsafe practices evolve whereby work performed on a line when train traffic operating - risks foreseeable - serious breach established - general and specific deterrence considered - many subjective factors mitigate level of penalty - early plea - first offender - established safety system - contrition demonstrated - steps taken to address deficiency in safety system - co-operation with investigating authorities - penalty imposed CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEDURE) ACT 1999 - s 22A - availability of discount for assistance to administration of justice - whether additional discount available where guilty plea entered and discount separately granted for utilitarian value of plea Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Rail Safety Act 2002 Rail Safety Act 2008 Rail Safety National Law (NSW) 2012 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 Cases Cited: Environment Protection Authority v Heggies Bulkhaul Ltd [2003] NSWLEC 77 Environment Protection Authority v Lubrizol International Inc [2003] NSWLEC 349 Independent Transport Safety Regulator v Patrick Portlink Pty Ltd t/as Patrick Portlink [2011] NSWIRComm 155 R v Da-Pra [2012] NSWSC 607 R v Fahda [2012] NSWSC 114 R v Kerry John Burke [2002] NSWCCA 353 R v Maglovski (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 16 R v Serone [2012] NSWSC 1232 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Independent Transport Safety Regulator (Prosecutor) Australian Rail Track Corporation Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Mrs Thomspon of counsel (Prosecutor) Mr Hodgkinson SC with Ms K Dawson of counsel (Defendant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Prosecutor) Henry Davis York (Defendant) File Number(s): IRC 550 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate