NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Perochinsky v Kirschner & Anor [2013] NSWSC 400 Hearing dates: 20-24 and 28-29 August 2012 Decision date: 24 April 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: White J Decision: 1. Direct entry of judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant in the sum of $553,152.73 plus interest at the rates prescribed for the purposes of s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 from 21 August 2009. 2. Order that the plaintiff's claims be otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: GIFTS - gifts inter vivos - gifts made under power of attorney - construction of s 163B of the Conveyancing Act 1919 - whether donee of power of attorney able to make gift to self - fiduciary obligations of attorney - meaning of attorney acting "on behalf of" donor of power - relationship between scope of attorney's authority and whether acts constitute a breach of attorney's obligations
GIFTS - gifts inter vivos - capacity of donor to make gift - effect of lack of capacity to make gift where donee unaware of lack of capacity
EQUITY - trusts and trustees - presumption of resulting trust where co-owners of property contribute to purchase price in proportions different from that in which legal title held - rebuttal of presumption
BANKING AND FINANCE - instruments - cheques - conversion of cheque Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Powers of Attorney Act 1971 (UK) Civil Procedure Act 2005 Cases Cited: Spina v Conran Associates Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 326 Spina v Permanent Custodians Ltd [2008] NSWSC 561 Hambro v Burnand [1904] 2 KB 10 Reckitt v Barnett, Pembroke & Slater Limited [1928] 2 KB 244 Re R [2000] NSWSC 886 Hughes v Hughes [2011] NSWSC 729 Ward v Ward (No. 2) [2011] NSWSC 1292 Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Ltd (No. 4) [2007] FCA 963; (2007) 160 FCR 35 Tobin v Broadbent (1947) 75 CLR 378 Chan v Zacharia (1984) 154 CLR 178 at 199; Breen v Williams (1996) 186 CLR 71 Hambro v Burnand [1904] 2 KB 10 Bryant, Powis & Bryant Limited v Quebec Bank [1893] AC 170 Lloyd v Grace, Smith & Co [1912] AC 716 Reckitt v Barnett, Pembroke & Slater Limited [1929] AC 176 Sweeney v Howard [2007] NSWSC 852 Crago v McIntyre [1976] 1 NSWLR 729 Beverley v Watson (Owen J, Supreme Court of Western Australia, 14 September 1994, unreported, BC9401884) Collins v May [2000] WASC 29 Stone v Registrar of Titles [2012] WASC 21 Gibbons v Wright (1954) 91 CLR 423 Elliot v Ince (1857) 7 De G.M. & G. 475; 44 ER 186 Ford v Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd [2009] NSWCA 186; (2009) 75 NSWLR 42 Collins v May [2000] WASC 29 Plunkett v Bull (1915) 19 CLR 544 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Norman v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1963) 109 CLR 9 Texts Cited: Halsbury's Laws of Australia in Title 15 on Agency, Chapter 2 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Antonina Perochinsky (Plaintiff) Sandra Kirschner (1st Defendant) Bernhard Kirschner (2nd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: N O Obrart (Plaintiff) N C Hutley SC with P Silver (Defendants) Solicitors: Brown Wright Stein (Plaintiff) Milne Berry Berger Freedman (Defendants) File Number(s): 2010/362138
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate