NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Michel NAHLOUS [2013] NSWCCA 90 Hearing dates: 18 April 2013 Decision date: 18 April 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Davies J at [2]; Adamson J at [3] Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW-Crown appeal against sentence-manifest inadequacy- whether grooming offences require a custodial sentence in all cases -sentence to reflect seriousness of particular conduct-remarks on sentence ought be read as a whole-meaning of 'victim' under s 16A(2)(d) Crimes Act (Cth) in the context of offence charged-does not extend to family of victim of grooming offences Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16A, s 16A(2)(d), s 16BA Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 5D Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 474.26(1), s 474.27, s 474.27A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s 28, s 28(4) Cases Cited: Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Customs Service v Karam (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 33 DPP v John Francis O'Reilly [2010] VSC 138 DPP v Rodriguez [2012] VCC 1216 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Elliott v Harris (No 2) (1976) 13 SASR 516 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 R v Anderson [2012] NSWCCA 175 R v Asplund; Asplund v R [2010] NSWCCA 316; 216 A Crim R 48 R v Burdon; Ex parte Attorney-General (Qld) [2005] QCA 147; 153 A Crim R 104 R v David Wayne Budd (District Court, 2 October 2007, Charteris DCJ, unreported) R v Fuller [2010] NSWCCA 192 R v Rampley [2010] NSWCCA 293 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 R v Zhu [2013] NSWSC 127 Tector v R [2008] NSWCCA 151; 186 A Crim R 133 Western Australia v Collier [2007] WASCA 250; 178 A Crim R 310 Texts Cited: House of Representatives, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 4 February 2010 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina Michel Nahlous Representation: Counsel: S McNaughton SC and J Roy (Crown) S Stanton (Respondent) Solicitors: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Thomas Booler & Co (Respondent) File Number(s): 2011/294151 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-06-15 00:00:00 Before: Nicholson DCJ File Number(s): 2011/294151
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate