NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Neil Ronald Telfer as Executor for the Estate of the late Lyall Telfer v Carolyn Telfer [2013] NSWSC 412 Hearing dates: 13, 14 August 2012 Decision date: 24 April 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Slattery J Decision: The plaintiff has not established that the 17 February 2011 codicil was properly executed in accordance with Succession Act, s 6 - directions made in relation to remaining issues Catchwords: SUCCESSION - Wills, probate and administration - executors and administrators - testator's will made June 2010 - plaintiff propounds and defendant challenges 17 February 2011 codicil - whether the deceased executed the codicil - whether the deceased lacked testamentary capacity to make the codicil - if codicil not admitted to probate, whether, the plaintiff, named executor of the will, and who propounded the codicil, should not be executor of the will. Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW); Probate and Administration Act 1898 Cases Cited: Burnside v Mulgrew [2007] NSWSC 550 Jeans v Cleary [2006] NSWSC 647 Tobaji v National Australia Bank [2009] NSWSC 41; Bowler v Bowler, Supreme Court of NSW (7 June 1990) Young J. Re Hunter (1932) NZLR 911 at 929. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff/Cross Defendant:- Neil Ronald Telfer as executor of the estate of the late Lyall Telfer Defendant/Cross Claimant:- Carolyn Telfer Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff/Cross Defendant:- M. K. Rollinson Defendant/Cross Claimant:- C. Carroll Solicitors: Plaintiff/Cross Defendant:- Benjamin Barrak, Barrak Lawyers Defendant/Cross Claimant:- Denis Williams, Whitehead Cooper Williams File Number(s): 2011/283114 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate