NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Charalambous -v- Yeung [2013] NSWADT 86 Hearing dates: 5 & 6 February 2013 Decision date: 24 April 2013 Jurisdiction: Retail Leases Division Before: K Rickards, Judicial Member Decision: 1.The Application is dismissed. 2.Unless either party files and serve submissions as to costs within 14 days of the date of this decision, there will be no order as to costs. If either party files and serves submissions as to costs within this period, the other party is to file and serve any submissions in reply within 28 days of the date of this decision, and a decision as to costs will then be made upon the papers pursuant to section 76 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997. Legislation Cited: Retail Leases Act 1994; Civil Liability Act 2002; Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Cases Cited: Lyons Road Pty Ltd v The Owners Strata Plan 38722 [2008] NSWADTAP 28; Manley v Alexander [2005] HCA 79; Sibraa v Brown [2012] NSWCA 328; Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna [1987] 126 CLR 479; Wyong Shire Council v Shirt [1980] HCA 12; Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak & Anor [2009] ACA 48 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Neophytos Charalambous (Applicant) Eric Au Yeung (Respondent) Representation: Counsel N Allan (Applicant); R Perla (Respondent) Bicknell & Monteith (Applicant); Turks Legal (Respondent) File Number(s): 125083
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate