NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hammond v R [2013] NSWCCA 93 Hearing dates: 11 March 2013 Decision date: 10 May 2013 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Slattery J at [2-79] Bellew J at [80] Decision: Question of law on stated case answered in the negative. The facts set out in the case stated do not support a finding of guilt for an offence contrary to Crimes Act 1900 s 195(1)(a), in particular the evidence is not capable of proving beyond reasonable doubt that the applicant's conduct had damaged the seat in question. Applicant's conviction quashed pursuant to Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 5B(3). Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - case stated from District Court under Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 5B - applicant convicted of one count of malicious damage to property under Crimes Act 1900 s 195(1)(a) - applicant spat on a stainless steel seat in police dock - whether evidence supports the element in the charge that the applicant had damaged the seat - meaning of "damages" in Crimes Act 1900 s 195(1)(a). Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Rules Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: "A" (a Juvenile) v R [1978] Crim L Rev 689 Australian Gaslight Co v The Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 City of Hawthorn v Victorian Welfare Association [1970] VR 205 Collins v State Rail Authority of NSW (1986) 5 NSWLR 209 Commissioners for Special Purposes of Income Tax v Pemsel [1891] AC 531 Director of Public Prosecution v Fraser and O'Donnell [2008] NSWSC 244 Edwards v Bairstow [1956] AC 14 Elias v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2012] NSWCA 302 Foster (1852) 6 Cox 25 Hardman v Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset Constabulary [1986] Crim LR 330 Industrial Equity Limited v Corporate Affairs Commission(Vic) [1990] VR 780 King v Lees (1948) 65 TLR 21 Lavorato v R [2012] NSWCCA 61 Morphitis v Salmon (1990) Crim Law Reports 48 R v Bowden (1957) (3) SA 148 R v. Fisher (1865) L.R. 1 C.C.R. 7 R v Hayne, Court of Criminal Appeal (18 September 1998) CCA 60496/97 R v Henderson & Battley Court of Appeal (Crim Div) (Unrep 29/11/84) R v Madden (1995) 85 A Crim R 367 R v Rigby [1956] HCA 38; 100 CLR 146 R v. Tracey (1821) Russ. & Ry. 452; 168 E.R. 893 R v Zischke (1982) Qd. R. 240 Ranicar v Frigmobile Pty Limited [1983] Tas R 113 Re Van der Lubbe (1949) 49 SR (NSW) 309 Samuels v Stubbs (1972) 4 SASR 200 Talay v R [2010] NSWCCA 308 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dion John Hammond (applicant) Director of Public Prosecution (respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Dennis (Applicant) H M Wilson (Respondent) Solicitors: Aboriginal Legal service S. Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2012/13873 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-09-20 00:00:00 Before: Lerve DCJ File Number(s): 2012/13873
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate