NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Regina v Naomi Lynne Joan CONSIDINE [2013] NSWCCA 97 Hearing dates: 5 April 2013 Decision date: 02 May 2013 Before: Emmett JA Price J RS Hulme AJ Decision: The Court should exercise its discretion not to re-sentence and should dismiss the Crown appeal. Catchwords: Sentence - accessory to attempt to possess border controlled drug - cocaine - commercial quantity - 20/6 months imprisonment - sentence manifestly inadequate - Crown appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16G Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 5D Cases Cited: Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Le Cerf (1976) 8 ALR 349 R v Deng [2007] NSWCCA 216, (2007) 176 A Crim R 1 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49, (2010) 77 NSWLR 7 R v Karan [2013] NSWCCA 53 R v Markarian [2003] NSWCCA 8 R v Nguyen; R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238 R v Spiteri (1999) NSWCCA 3 R v Wong & Leung [1999] NSWCCA 420; (1999) NSWLR 340 Tyler v R [2007] 173 A Crim R 458 Wong v R [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Appellant: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) Respondent: Naomi Lynne Joan Considine Representation: Counsel: Appellant Crown: Mr DK Chapple SC Respondent: Ms Bashir Solicitors: Appellant: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) Respondent: Legal Aid NSW File Number(s): CCA 2011/11246 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2012-09-06 00:00:00 Before: McLoughlin SC DCJ File Number(s): 2011/11246
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate