NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kelly v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 449 Hearing dates: 27/03/2013 Decision date: 16 April 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: 1. I order that Mr Ajoy Ghosh be permitted to: (a) include all references to, and disclose the contents of, files "08/14/12" and "08/20/12" contained in the listing of 24 files attached to the email from Ajoy Ghosh to Longmores Associates dated 5 September 2012 and any metadata associated with those files in his reports of 4 September 2012, 7 September 2012 and annexures to those reports; (b) include in Annexure F to his report of 4 September 2012 and Annexure D to his report of 7 September 2012 the following information in relation to the conversion log for file titled "Letter Head 122 Arthur St": (i) the first column headed "name" and all material listed on the line underneath that heading; and (ii) the date and all words which occur after "...\activePDF\primoPDF..." in the ninth column headed "full path". 2. Costs of this motion to be costs in the cause. Cases Cited: Brimaud v Honeysett Instant Print Pty Limited (1988) 217 ALR 44; Kelly v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2012] NSWSC 1487 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: David Kelly (P1) Lucrum Consulting Pty Limited (P2) Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (D) Representation: Counsel: Mr Loiterton (P1 & P2) A J McInerney SC (D)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate