NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Defence Housing Australia v Randwick City Council [2013] NSWLEC 59 Hearing dates: 18 February 2013, 27 March 2013 Decision date: 08 May 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pain J Decision: 1. Appeal upheld. 2. Matter remitted to Commissioners for final determination including of merit matters, if any. Catchwords: Appeal - appeal under s 56A Land and Environment Court Act - exercise of discretion to allow appellant to raise legal argument contrary to agreed position at first instance - development application not a Crown development application as defined in the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - matter remitted to Commissioners for consideration of merits if any such issues remain Legislation Cited: Defence Housing Australia Act 1987 (Cth) s 11 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4, s 6, Part 4 Div 4, s 88, s 89, s97 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 226, cl 277 Interpretation Act 1987 s 5, s 12, s 13, s 65 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 64 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) Cases Cited: Coulton v Holcombe [1986] HCA 33; (1986) 162 CLR 1 Defence Housing Australia v Randwick City Council [2012] NSWLEC 1181 Forsyth v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2004] NSWCA 474; (2004) 62 NSWLR 132 Inglis v Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia (1969) 119 CLR 334 Kuswardana v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 54 FLR 334 Metwally v University of Wollongong [1985] HCA 28; (1985) 60 ALR 68 Multicon Engineering Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corporation (2000) 47 NSWLR 631 Pfeiffer v Stephens [2001] HCA 71; (2001) 209 CLR 57 Re Residential Tenancies Tribunal of New South Wales and Henderson; Ex parte the Defence Housing Authority [1997] HCA 36; (1997) 190 CLR 410 Rizhao Steel Holding Group Ltd v Koolan Iron Ore Pty Ltd [2012] WASCA 50; (2012) 287 ALR 315 Superannuation Fund Investment Trust v Commissioner of Stamps of the State of South Australia (1979) 145 CLR 330 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Defence Housing Australia (Appellant) Randwick City Council (Respondent) Representation: Ms M Allars (Applicant) Mr B Coles QC (Respondent) Piper Alderman (Applicant) Norton Rose (Respondent) File Number(s): 10919 of 2012 Decision under appeal Citation: Defence Housing Australia v Randwick City Council [2012] NSWLEC 1181 Date of Decision: 2012-07-09 00:00:00 Before: Dixon C, Fakes C File Number(s): 10992 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate