NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Konica Minolta Business Solutions Australia Pty Ltd v Vongkeneta [2013] NSWSC 486 Hearing dates: 24 April 2013 Decision date: 24 April 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Hallen J Decision: See Paragraphs 65 to 68 Catchwords: Claims for money judgment against three Defendants - No appearance by first and second Defendants at the trial - Claim against third Defendant resolved by agreement of the Plaintiff and the third Defendant - Trial proceeds in absence of first and second Defendants - No Appearance or Defence filed by first and second Defendants - Deemed admissions, as well as evidence read and documents tendered at the trial - Plaintiff entitled to relief sought against first and second Defendants Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Anton Fabrications (NSW) Pty Ltd, Re; Bentley Smythe Pty Ltd v Anton Fabrications (NSW) Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 186 French Consulting Pty Limited v Lawson Stuart Donald [2011] NSWSC 584 Smirski v Macander [2010] NSWSC 929 Ward v Ward [2011] NSWSC 107 Wily v King [2010] NSWSC 352 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Konica Minolta Business Solutions Australia Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Linda Sisaveth Vongkeneta (first Defendant)Houmchanh Simmalavong (aka Eddie Simmalavong) (second Defendant) Sutari Vongkeneta (third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Newton (Plaintiff) Solicitors: Middletons (Plaintiff) LAC Lawyer Pty Ltd (third Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/234933
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate