NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Thomas v Symons [2013] NSWSC 490 Hearing dates: 4, 5, 11 and 30 April 2013 Decision date: 08 May 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Windeyer AJ Decision: Refer to paras [38] and [39] of judgment Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY - easements - easement by estoppel - appropriate relief to give effect to estoppel - claim for easement under s 88K of the Conveyancing Act 1919 - requirement of reasonable necessity - meaning of reasonable use and development - construction of s 6 of the Roads Act 1993 Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 Roads Act 1993 Cases Cited: Duic v Duic [2013] NSWCA 42 Waddell v Waddell [2012] NSWCA 214 Walsh v Walsh [2012] NSWCA 57 Evans v Evans [2011] NSWCA 92 Delaforce v Simpson-Cook [2010] NSWCA 84 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher [1988] HCA 7; (1988) 164 CLR 387 Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Tanlane Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 445 Rainbowforce Pty Ltd v Skyton Holdings Ltd [2010] NSWLEC 2 117 York Street Pty Ltd v Proprietors of Strata Plan 16123 (1998) 43 NSWLR 504 Blulock Pty Ltd v Majic [2001] NSWSC 1063 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Edna Jean Thomas (Plaintiff) Donald Sidney Symons (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M J Heath (Plaintiff) G Waugh (Defendant) Solicitors: The Norton Law Group (Plaintiff) RMB Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/322267
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate