NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Silver Star Construction Pty Limited t/as Genesis Construction Australia v Denham Constructions Pty Limited [2011] NSWDC 254 Hearing dates: 23, 24 & 25 November 2011 Decision date: 25 November 2011 Before: Judge E Olsson SC Decision: 1. Notice of Motion for a stay is dismissed. 2. Defendant (Denham Constructions Pty Limited) to pay the plaintiff's (Silver Star Constructions Pty Limited) costs. Catchwords: Security of payment; stay of enforcement; competing interests Legislation Cited: The Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) (SOPA); Civil Procedure Act 2005 Cases Cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corp Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 685; The Attorney-General v Emerson and Ors (1889) 24 QBD 56; Wilson v Church (No.2) [1879] 12 Ch D 454; Alexander v Cambridge Credit (supra) at 695; Paynter Dixon Constructions Pty Ltd v JF; CG Tilston Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 869; Brodyn Pty Ltd t/as Time Cost; Quality v Davenport [2003] NSWSC 1019; Grosvenor Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd (in administration) v Musico and Ors [2004] NSWSC 344; Herschel Engineering Ltd v Breen Property Ltd [2000] BLR 272; Veolia Water Solutions v Kruger Engineering [No. 3] [2007] NSWSC 459; Bitannia Pty Ltd v Parkline Constructions Pty Ltd (2006) 67 NSWLR 9; Chase Oyster Bar v Hamo Industries [2010] NSWCA 190 Texts Cited: Keating on Building Contracts (7th edition, First Supplement) Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Silver Star Construction Pty Limited t/as Genesis Construction Australia (Plaintiff) Denham Constructions Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Mr L Shipway (Plaintiff) Mr F P Hicks (Defendant) Vincent Young Solicitors (Plaintiff) Crisp Legal (Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/353316 & 2011/11518
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate