NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Paul Fishlock v The Campaign Palace Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 531 Hearing dates: 18, 19, 20, 21 February 2013, oral submissions 20 March 2013, further oral submissions 3 April 2013 Decision date: 09 May 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Sackar J Decision: See paragraph [324]. Catchwords: CONTRACTS - terms of contract - employment contract does not specify the duties of the employee - whether post-contract conduct of the parties can be used to identify the terms, subject matter or scope of application of an employment contract which does not specify the employee's duties.
CONTRACTS - repudiation - whether the extent of alteration to the employee's position or status amounted to a repudiation of the employment contract - whether an employee can rely on after-acquired information to justify termination of the employment contract.
CONTRACTS - assessment of damages - relevance of probable course of events if the contract was not repudiated - mitigation - whether the employee failed to act reasonably to mitigate loss.
EMPLOYMENT LAW - long service leave - no dispute - payable where employer repudiates contract of employment - redundancy payment - whether employee entitled to redundancy payment under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) - whether employment was terminated at the initiative of the employer where the employee accepted the employer's repudiation - whether the employment was terminated because the employer no longer required the employee's job to be done by anyone.
TRADE AND COMMERCE - restraints of trade - relevant principles - non-operation of restraint provisions where employment contract repudiated by employer. Legislation Cited: Long Service Leave Act 1955 Restraints of Trade Act 1976 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) Cases Cited: Administration of Papua and New Guinea v Daera Guba (1973) 130 CLR 353 Afovos Shipping Co SA v Pagnan [1983] 1 WLR 195 Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570 Barras v Aberdeen Steam Trawling and Fishing Co Ltd [1933] AC 402 Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch D 339 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 Buckley v Tutty (1971) 125 CLR 353 C H Magill v National Australia Bank Ltd [2001] NSWCA 221 Cactus Imaging Pty Ltd v Peters (2006) 71 NSWLR 9 Cameron v Asciano Services Pty Limited [2011] VSC 36 Commonwealth Homes and Investments Co Ltd v MacKellar (1939) 63 CLR 351 Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64 Concut Pty Ltd v Worrell (2000) 176 ALR 693 County Securities Pty Limited v Challenger Group Holdings Pty Limited [2008] NSWCA 193 Curro v Beyond Productions Pty Ltd (1993) 30 NSWLR 337 Delaney v Staples [1992] 1 AC 687 Downer EDI Limited v Gillies [2012] NSWCA 333 Easling v Mahoney Insurance Brokers (2001) 78 SASR 489 Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union (2004) 221 CLR 309 Ex parte Campbell (1870) LR 5 Ch App 703 Fardell v Coates Hire Operations Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 346 Gillies v Downer EDI Ltd [2013] HCATrans 81 Hide & Skin Trading Pty Ltd v Oceanic Meat Traders Ltd (1990) 20 NSWLR 310 Jardin v Metcash Ltd [2011] NSWCA 409 John Fairfax Publications Ltd v Birt [2006] NSWSC 995 Keays v J P Morgan Administrative Services Australia Ltd [2012] FCAFC 100 Lane v Arrowcrest Group Pty Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 427 Laurinda Pty Ltd v Capalaba Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (1989) 166 CLR 623 Lewis v Motorworld Garages Limited [1986] ICR 157 Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1998] AC 20 McDonald v Parnell Laboratories (Aust) (2007) 168 IR 375 Mohazab v Dick Smith Electronics Pty Ltd (No 2) (1995) 62 IR 200 Nottinghamshire County Council v Meikle [2004] EWCA Civ 859 Orton v Melman [1981] 1 NSWLR 583 Otis Elevator Company Pty Limited v John Nolan [2007] NSWSC 593 Qantas Airways Ltd v Christie (1998) 193 CLR 280 Quinn v Jack Chia (Australia) Limited [1992] 1 VR 567 RDF Media Group Plc v Clements [2008] IRLR 207 Re Alcan Australia Ltd; Ex parte Federation of Industrial, Manufacturing & Engineering Employees (1994) 181 CLR 96 Reilly v Praxa Ltd [2004] ACTSC 41 Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Ex 850 Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust v South Sydney City Council (2002) 240 CLR 45 Seven Network (Operations) Ltd v Warburton (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 386 Shepherd v Felt & Textiles of Australia Ltd (1931) 45 CLR 359 Shevill v Builders Licensing Board (1982) 149 CLR 620 Sidameneo (No 456) Pty Ltd v Alexander [2011] NSWCA 418 Sperandio v Lynch (No 2) [2006] FCA 1838 Sportsvision Australia Pty Ltd v Tallglen Pty Ltd (1998) 44 NSWLR 103 Sunbird Plaza Pty Ltd v Maloney (1988) 166 CLR 245 Tasman Capital Pty Ltd v Sinclair (2008) 75 NSWLR 1 Tullet Prebon v BGC Brokers LP [2010] IRLR 648 Visscher v Giudice (2009) 239 CLR 361 Walker v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Ltd (2006) 233 ALR 687 Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158 Westen v Union des Assurances de Paris (1996) 88 IR 259 Western Excavating Ltd v Sharp [1978] QB 761 White v Australian and New Zealand Theatres Ltd (1943) 67 CLR 266 Woolworths v Olson [2004] NSWCA 372 Wright v Gasweld Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 317 Texts Cited: G H L Fridman, The Modern Law of Employment, (1963) Stevens and Sons J W Carter, The Construction of Commercial Contracts, (2013) Hart Publishing J D Heydon, Cross on Evidence, 9th edition (2013) LexisNexis Butterworths M Irving, The Contract of Employment, (2012) LexisNexis Butterworths Sappideen, O'Grady, Riley and Warburton, Macken's Law of Employment, 7th edition (2011) Thomson Reuters Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Fishlock (Plaintiff) The Campaign Palace Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Kimber SC, A Gotting (Plaintiff) A Moses SC, Y Shariff (Defendant) Solicitors: Watson Mangioni (Plaintiff) Norton Rose (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/84306
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate