NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v MacLeod [2013] NSWCCA 108 Hearing dates: 9 April 2013 Decision date: 13 May 2013 Before: Simpson J at [1]; Harrison J at [66]; Bellew J at [67] Decision: (i) Crown appeal allowed; (ii) The sentence imposed on the respondent be quashed; (iii) In lieu thereof the respondent be sentenced to imprisonment for 9 months, commencing on 13 May 2013 and expiring on 12 February 2014, with a non-parole period of 6 months and 3 weeks expiring on 3 December 2013. (iv) Direct that the respondent be released at the expiration of the non-parole period. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - sentencing - Crown appeal - respondent convicted after trial of offence contrary to s 200 of the Police Act 1990 - nine further offences contrary to s 16(1) of the Poisons and Therapeutic Substances Act 1966 taken into account pursuant to Pt 3 Div 3 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - whether sentencing judge erred by suspending sentence - hardship to third parties - whether reasonably open to sentencing judge to find that co-offender did not pass on information to respondent - whether sentence manifestly inadequate - no exceptional circumstances within R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 principle - appeal allowed - sentence quashed - respondent re-sentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Poisons and Therapeutic Substances Act 1966 Police Act 1990 Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Cases Cited: Bangaru v R [2012] NSWCCA 204 Dipangkear v R [2010] NSWCCA 156 Elmir v R [2009] NSWCCA 22 Flick v R [2012] NSWCCA 170 FP v R [2012] NSWCCA 182 Hay v R [2013] NSWCCA 22 Hopley v R [2008] NSWCCA 105 Ihemeje v R [2012] NSWCCA 269 King v R [2010] NSWCCA 202 McCraw v R [2011] NSWCCA 162 R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 R v Kertebani [2010] NSWCCA 221 Sinkovich v R [2011] NSWCCA 90 Waugh v R [2010] NSWCCA 3 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Applicant) Andrew Michael MacLeod (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Pickering SC (Applicant) A J Kimmins (Respondent) Solicitors: S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Applicant) Moloney MacCallum Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2011/187436 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2012-11-14 00:00:00 Before: Phegan ADCJ File Number(s): 2011/187436
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate