NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd v Hamersley Iron Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 536 Hearing dates: 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14 & 18 March and 11 April 2013 Decision date: 10 May 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: Hammerschlag J Decision: Verdict for plaintiff on its claim and verdict for cross-claimant on its cross-claim against second defendant/second cross-defendant. Plaintiff's claim and cross-claimant's cross-claim against first defendant/first cross-defendant dismissed Catchwords: CONTRACT - construction - whether on the proper construction of a written agreement the defendants are (or either of them is) obliged to pay a royalty in respect of iron ore won from a defined area - whether ore is being won from a certain part of the defined area by a person deriving title through or under that of the first defendant or by the first defendant in association with another person Legislation Cited: Mining Act 1904 (WA) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Arbitration (Foreign Awards and Agreements) Act 1974 (Cth) Cases Cited: Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165 Wilkie v Gordian Runoff Ltd (2005) 221 CLR 522 International Air Transport Association v Ansett Australia Holdings Ltd (2008) 234 CLR 151 Western Export Services Inc v Jireh International Pty Ltd [2011] HCA 45; (2011) 86 ALJR 1 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 337 Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd v Coopers Brewery Ltd (2006) 156 FCR 1 Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd (2009) 76 NSWLR 603 Phoenix Commercial Enterprises Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council [2010] NSWCA 64 Pacific Carriers v BNP Paribas (2004) 218 CLR 451 Roussel-Uclaf v Searle [1978] 1 Lloyd's Rep 225 Sahab Holdings Pty Ltd v Registrar-General (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 42 Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v Sahab Holdings Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 11 Tanning Research Laboratories v O'Brien (1990) 169 CLR 332 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd - Plaintiff Hamersley Iron Pty Limited - First Defendant/First Cross-Defendant Mount Bruce Mining Pty Limited - Second Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd - Third Defendant/Cross-Claimant Channar Mining Pty Ltd - Third Cross-Defendant Rio Tinto Exploration Pty Ltd - Fourth Cross-Defendant Hamersley Exploration Pty Ltd - Fifth Cross-Defendant Representation: Counsel: A.J. Myers QC with K.A. Stern SC, K.H. Barrett and R. Hardcastle- Plaintiff N.J. Young QC with M.J. Darke and J. Garas - First and Second Defendants, and all Cross-Defendants J.C. Giles - Third Defendant/Cross-Claimant Solicitors: Clayton Utz - Plaintiff Allens Linklaters - First and Second Defendants, and all Cross-Defendants Horton Rhodes Lawyers - Third Defendant/Cross-Claimant File Number(s): 2009/323345
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate