NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: King v Benecke [2013] NSWSC 568 Hearing dates: 6-10, 29 and 31 August, 13 December 2012 Decision date: 23 August 2013 Before: Harrison J Decision: 1. Verdict for the defendants. 2. Unless within 14 days I receive notice given to my Associate that either party wishes to contend for a different order, I will order that the plaintiff pay the defendants' costs. Catchwords: PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE - plaintiff sues former solicitor - where plaintiff sought effective ownership and control of family farming and grazing business - where business shares were to be acquired by plaintiff from family members - whether solicitor was retained by plaintiff - where solicitor denied existence of retainer - no formal retainer - whether retainer implied by conduct of parties - where professional relationship between solicitor and plaintiff's family spanned generations - retainer existed - whether breach of retainer or duty of care - where solicitor advised parties on both sides of transaction - conflict of interest - where misuse of confidential information - where failure to advise client properly - breach of duty and retainer - causation - whether breaches disadvantaged plaintiff's negotiating position at mediation - whether breaches influenced final settlement sum offered - where plaintiff influenced by own conduct independent of defendant Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 Corporations Act 2000 Cases Cited: ACN 070 037 579 Pty Ltd v Larvik Pty Ltd [2008] QCA 416 Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak (2009) 239 CLR 420 Astley v Austrust Limited [1999] HCA 6; (1999) 197 CLR 1 Colyer Fehr Tallow Pty Ltd v KNZ Australia Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 457 County Securities Pty Ltd v Challenger Group Holdings Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 193 Dominic v Riz [2009] NSWCA 216 Ermogeneous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc [2002] HCA 8; (2002) 209 CLR 95 Gates v City Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd [1986] HCA 3; (1986) 160 CLR 1 Hendricks v McGeoch [2008] NSWCA 53 Johnson v Perez [1988] HCA 64; (1988) 166 CLR 351 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd [1990] HCA 20; (1990) 169 CLR 638 McCrohon v Harith [2010] NSWCA 67 Monaghan Surveyors Pty Ltd v Stratford Glen-Avon Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 94 Pegrum v Fatharly (1996) 14 WAR 92 Poseidon Ltd & Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL [1994] HCA 4; (1994) 179 CLR 332 Simmons v Story [2001] VSCA 187 State of New South Wales v Mikhael [2012] NSWCA 338 Steele v Marshan [2012] NSWCA 141 Strong v Woolworths Ltd [2012] HCA 5; (2012) 246 CLR 182 Todorovic v Waller [1981] HCA 72; (1981) 150 CLR 402 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Category: Principal judgment Parties: George Berkeley Ewart King (Plaintiff) Ian John Benecke (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D L Williams SC with T J Breakspear and M F Newton (Plaintiff) I Pike SC with J J Hutton (Defendant) Solicitors: Thompson Eslick Solicitors (Plaintiff) Yeldham Price O'Brien Lusk (Defendant) File Number(s): 2009/297857
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate