NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Franklin v R [2013] NSWCCA 122 Hearing dates: 14 May 2013 Decision date: 24 May 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Hall J at [49] Davies J at [50] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - six offences of aggravated sexual intercourse and aggravated indecent assault on 14 year old girl by offender and his partner - offences occurred on one night - whether the extent of accumulation of sentences was excessive - whether principle of totality observed - whether total effective sentence was manifestly excessive - no general rule of law that sentences be concurrent or consecutive - decision a discretionary one - fundamental question whether criminality of one offence can be encompassed in the criminality of another - sentence not excessive - appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 - sections 61O(1), 61M(2), 66C(4) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Cahyadi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 Ibbs v R [1987] HCA 46; 163 CLR 447 LG v R [2012] NSWCCA 249 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 R v AJP [2004] NSWCCA 434; 150 A Crim R 575 R v Jarrold [2010] NSWCCA 69 R v MAK [2006] NSWCCA 381; 167 A Crim R 159 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thomas William Franklin - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr P Boulten SC - Applicant Ms T Smith - Respondent Crown Solicitors: B Sandland, Legal Aid NSW - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2010/246039 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-08-12 00:00:00 Before: His Honour Judge Zahra SC File Number(s): 2010/246039
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate