NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Coastplan Consulting v Gosford City Council [2013] NSWLEC 1087 Hearing dates: 15, 16 May 2013 Decision date: 23 May 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Hussey C Decision: (1)The appeal is dismissed. (2)The SEPP 1 Objection to the minimum lot size development standard in cl 18(3)(d) of IDO 122 is disallowed. (3)Development consent to DA No 43165/2012 Part 1 for a twolot subdivision of 179 The Scenic Drive, Killcare Heights is refused. (4)The exhibits may be returned except for 2, 3, A and C. Catchwords: Development application - rural subdivision, minimum lot size - SEPP 1 Objection - objectives of the zone - character of the area - tourist development Legislation Cited: IDO No 122 State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 - Development Standards Draft Gosford Local Environmental Plan 2009 State Environmental Planning Policy 71 - Coastal Protection Rural Fires Act 1997 Cases Cited: Hooker Corporation Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council (1986) 130 LGERA 438 Wehbe v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 827 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Coastplan Consulting (Applicant)
Gosford City Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr G McKee (Applicant)
Mr M Everingham (Respondent) File Number(s): 10194 0f 2013
Judgment
Background 1This appeal was lodged against council's refusal of a two-lot rural subdivision at 179 The Scenic Road, Killcare Heights. The following contentions were identified for the appeal: * Non-compliance with minimum lot sizes and SEPP 1 Objection * Consistency with the objectives of the zone * Compliance with the character of the area * Bushfire, asset protection zones (APZ)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate